Burlison describes some of the videos he saw, he saw video of intelligently controlled plasma orbs. He is now a believer "I can now definitively say there's something there" From source: This clip is just one example where Eric says he now definitively believes there is something there. The only question is, who does it belong to? And are the craft trying to show off? There's much more to learn from this interview. Really important updates and information. I hope everyone can take something away from this one. source: https://x.com/UAPodcast850/status/2029617819495678321

Former Canadian Defense Minister Paul Hellyer talking about NHI Technologies including fiber optics and Kevlar 🤷🏻‍♂️👽

One of several 1970s documentaries on the subject of unidentified flying objects (UFO), supporting the view that Earth is visited regularly by extra-terrestrial engines and aliens. UFO's Are Real features interviews with Brandon Chase, Wendelle Stevens, Bruce Maccabee , and more.

At some point you inevitably run into the reports about objects appearing over missile bases and even cases where nuclear systems were supposedly shut down. If those reports are even partially true, it opens up a pretty interesting line of questions. One theory people throw around is that NHI might have some kind of rule about non-interference unless humanity is about to destroy itself. Another idea is that nuclear detonations might affect more than just the physical world, maybe something about radiation or energy interacting with whatever layers of reality might exist beyond what we normally perceive. But that’s where my brain starts getting stuck. We already dropped two nuclear bombs in war. If something out there was actively monitoring or concerned about nuclear weapons, why weren’t those stopped? And beyond that, there have been hundreds of nuclear tests since the 1940s. Entire test sites were detonating bombs regularly during the Cold War. If nuclear weapons are such a big deal to whatever intelligence might be behind the phenomenon, why allow all of that to happen? So I’m curious how people who believe the missile base incidents explain that gap. If there really is some kind of intervention happening around nuclear weapons, why did it only seem to show up decades after the first bombs were already used and tested?

Panel discussion on the Age of Disclosure at SXSW! >We’re excited to announce a SXSW panel about The Age of Disclosure. >Going to be a great day for disclosure! >[https://x.com/ageofdisclosure/status/2029344287457198533](https://x.com/ageofdisclosure/status/2029344287457198533) THE AGE OF DISCLOSURE - TRAILER The Age of Disclosure is an explosive documentary that reveals an 80-year global cover-up of non-human intelligent life and a secret war among major nations to reverse engineer advanced technology of non-human origin. Featuring testimony from 34 U.S. Government, military, and intelligence community insiders, the film exposes the profound stakes for the future of humanity. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXUEcfgZv70](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXUEcfgZv70) Jay Stratton, former director of UAP Task Force (Dave Grusch's former boss) just admitted on camera that he is a first hand witness to Non-Human Intelligence - "I have seen with my own eyes non-human craft and non-human beings". [https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1i7nk5n/jay\_stratton\_former\_director\_of\_uap\_task\_force/](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1i7nk5n/jay_stratton_former_director_of_uap_task_force/)

Real America's Voice - Are Aliens Real? “Oh, of course!” - Michael Mazzola (BrokebackUFO) says that there have been many high-ranking whistleblowers who admit to a cover-up for years when it comes to UFOs. [https://x.com/RealAmVoice/status/2028635953066107026](https://x.com/RealAmVoice/status/2028635953066107026) UFO Disclosure Coming? Hillary Clinton Deposition, Trump Exec Order & Alien Cover-Up Claims Full Interview: [](https://www.youtube.com/@RealAmericasVoice)[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHr1mqALiIk](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHr1mqALiIk)

Time: 6:58pm UTC March 5th 2026 Location: 10km from Legazpi City, Philippines (Mayon Volcano) Recently ive had the mayon volcano (located in the Philippines) livestream playing on my TV 12 hours of the day for the past week or so. Ive never noticed anything strange in the sky until about 2 days ago  this big circular mass sometimes illuminated sometimes almost translucent black just floating to the right of the volcano (will include earlier photos of this mass in the comments). No erratic movements at first just slowly gliding around but always staying in that general area. I initially thought it might be a weird light refraction or scratch on the camera lense. Tonight at 6:58pm UTC that one big mass was illuminated in the night sky in its usual area until an orb of light floats up from the trees (bottom right) and starts dancing with/around the circular mass. Not quite sure what to think of this. my only logical ideas are either that they're either drones, high grade millitary technology or kites with lights attached idk lol Let me know what you think.

https://preview.redd.it/qucwjnshg6ng1.jpg?width=4080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=256fdde23539b9f521f6cba3e9ce034e9631fe1d Hello, recently I saw a similar post of a weird light bouncing around and decided to post my own. One trail is visible from the get-go but there's also a second one on the right side of the picture. https://preview.redd.it/79ml8y4oi6ng1.png?width=4059&format=png&auto=webp&s=f8d75e1adf732d904379d1e9c553dead687e9cff The one to the left looks like it changed its trajectory, speed (and maybe rotated?) multiple times and the one on the right side is barely visible. Picture was taken with Galaxy A54 5G, Pro mode 10 second exposure. Phone was laying on a flat car mask, so there was no camera movement. Time: 25th December 2025 at 1:28am Location: Village in North-East part of Poland (Masuria)

After 8 year, I still think about the up close experience I had with a ufo. It went like this, we were driving through a neighborhood by a scenic park near Cincinnati, Ohio. I get a quiet voice in my head to look up, boom, there it is a sliver disc about 5 ft tall, 10-12 feet long. Looked it it was hand built, having steel panels cut out to fit a disc, with screws lining the panels. It spun around slowly, silent with just one red blinking light on the side. It flew in front of our car then, hovered over top the houses next to each other. Eventually taking off into the sky. It was incredible. I hope that we can get some in sight to the truth.

This may date me, but I remember when Dan Aykroyd was constantly on some network, etc talking about UFOs/etc. I would think someone with his caliber and ability to bring even more attention and awareness to this topic. You’d hear from him more often. But it’s been quite sometime since I’ve seen/heard from him in any capacity around this topic. Just Incase there is a word count that I have to hit in order to post this, I’m going to say the same thing over again. This may date me, but I remember when Dan Aykroyd was constantly on some network, etc talking about UFOs/etc. I would think someone with his caliber and ability to bring even more attention and awareness to this topic. You’d hear from him more often. But it’s been quite sometime since I’ve seen/heard from him in any capacity around this topic.

Reputable Australian current affairs programme, 60 Minutes Australia has released all of its episodes to date that focus on the question: “Ask we alone in the universe?” Watch at: https://youtu.be/g7Xn2psTWjY?si=jAMRbREFThnkw5Ur

My sighting: Location: Manchester, NH Date: 4/9/2025 @ 8:52pm EST Description: My friend and I are decently familiar with standard aviation lights and flight patterns. However, saw a craft that defies our knowledge. Stargazing in a parking lot in clear conditions (10mi visibility), we spotted a craft to the northwest that appeared massive and at a high altitude. The object featured three distinct lights: two fixed outboard lights and a center light that waved rhythmically from left to right, similar to a pronounced yawing motion. Despite its size, the craft was completely silent. We checked the area's NOTAMs and found an active advisory for UAS, suggesting it might be a military drone. However, even with my friend’s background in military aviation, he was genuinely unsettled and unable to identify it. Active-Nebula’s sighting: Location: Karlovac, Croatia Date: 8/3/2025 @ 1:27am CET Description: “( bad english ) Filmed an hour after midnight, first cut is the original clip, then a higher contrast and zoom in. Time: 8.3.2025 or 3.8.2025, 1:27 in the morning Location: over city Karlovac, Croatia No sound was coming from the crafts, it was a quiet night. I started recording them later, before that the orbs were moving across my screen they were shifting formations more intensly. It was almost like they were circling each other. This isnt the first time this happend to me, but in previous encounters i never recorded or i just couldnt get it on footage. But all the encounters involved glowy orbs of orange dim lights almost as playfully moving in the sky. This is the first time i had something like this on video, the orbs didnt seem that far out. But one thing for sure is, they were over the city. The video is trash, but you can obviously see three orbs i pointed my camera at moving in the sky.”

We are sharing a new clip featuring **Representative Eric Burlison** discussing disclosure-related efforts in Washington, including comments about alleged “legacy” reverse-engineering claims and what he says he’s doing to follow up. Below are the **key details with timestamps**, followed by everything you need to participate in the AMA. --- ## Key details from the clip (with timestamps) - **00:00–00:19** — Rep. Burlison references what’s being reported as a **reverse engineering program**—often described as a “**legacy program**”—involving craft of **non-human intelligence**. He describes it as a “rabbit hole” he’s trying to track down. - **00:20–00:37** — He says he has **requested permission** (from the **White House**) to **go to locations** where people report there may be: - a **research center** doing reverse engineering, and/or - a **vehicle**, and/or - **bodies**. - **00:38–00:56** — He states the **White House has no problem saying yes** to the request, but he still has to go through **bureaucratic channels**. **Notable update:** he says their **first site visit is scheduled for the end of this month**. - **00:56–01:04** — The interviewer asks whether “all these programs in all of these sites” are under the authority of **Secretary Hegseth**. - **01:06–01:22** — Rep. Burlison says **yes**, and adds that within some sites there may be involvement from: - the **Department of Defense**, - **intelligence agencies**, and - **private companies on site**—which he says is specifically what he’s trying to get to. - **01:24–01:46** — He mentions rumors that contractors (examples given: **MITRE**, **EG&G**, and major defense firms like **Northrop Grumman**, **Lockheed**, **Raytheon**, etc.) may have **components** of craft they are **reverse engineering**. --- ## 🔴 LIVE AMA — Saturday, March 7 (1 PM ET / 10 AM PT) ✅ **Ask your questions here (ONE question per comment):** https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1rhdeco/livestream_ama_rep_eric_burlison_director_james/ 📺 **Watch live on YouTube:** https://www.youtube.com/live/9bzH1ssL9yI?si=ztNZFoElsGMtkYqx 🐦 **Watch on X (Twitter):** https://x.com/theanomalousc 🎮 **Watch on Twitch:** https://www.twitch.tv/theanomalouscoalition ⏳ **Countdown:** https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20260307T13&p0=179&msg=The+Anomalous+Coalition+Presents%3A+Eric+Burlison+%2B+James+Fox+with+Host+Leslie+Kean+%7C+Live+Reddit+AMA&font=slab --- ### Quick reminders - **There’s still time to post your question** before the show. - Please keep it to **ONE question per comment** (post multiple comments if you have multiple questions). - Read existing questions and **upvote** the ones you most want asked live.

Time : July 2021 at 11pm it's been so long i can't remember the exact day Location : Noirmoutier, France I was with a friend laying on the grass and we saw two light way brighter then other stars they were going in opposite direction (going head to head) and when they were getting pretty close one light disapeared in multiple small light and the other changed direction instantly, i have no clues what it could be maybe i heard about satellite meant to destroy space debris, i linked a small animation to represent it https://reddit.com/link/1rkvvsq/video/07l00ab143ng1/player

Link to Steven Digna's surreal testimony: https://youtu.be/UTyE0gC08PM?is=hxLm7EiVIXU2_LPY Why isn't he being picked up the likes of Jesse Michels, UAPgerb, Ross Coulthart, etc? This guy needs to be platformed to speak in much more detail. He seems so rushed in the press club video. So yes, why is this guy not front and center? I'm deeply puzzled by this

Source: [UFO Reports and Documents 1943](https://project1947.com/fig/1943a.htm) **California in 1943** In Escondido one day in November 1943 around 1030PM, on a dark, moonless night, the Sledge family, husband, wife and son, were listening to the radio when Mrs. Sledge stepped outside for some air.  She noticed an object hovering 15 feet above the roof of her house, shaped like a disc with a dome, some 12 feet in diameter.  The dome had square windows all around, about 30 inches square each.  Behind two of them she could see silhouetted shapes like men.  The dome inside appeared to be like shiny chrome. Mrs. Sledge ran into the house for her husband, thinking that an aircraft was in trouble.  Both husband and son had the object in view but could not identify it.  A quiet humming, like a spinning top could be heard as it hovered. As Mrs. Sledge flashed a flashlight on the ground, believing that the object wanted to land, it blinked out its lights and disappeared.  The family kept silent about it until many years later.

FOX 32 Chicago "Just months after the release of the documentary film, "The Age of Disclosure," President Donald Trump has directed the government to release any and all files pertaining to aliens on Earth. Tonight, we catch up with the film's director, Dan Farah." [https://x.com/wow36932525/status/2029143047137607683](https://x.com/wow36932525/status/2029143047137607683) 'The Age of Disclosure' director Dan Farah on Trump’s order to release alien files Just months after the release of the documentary film, "The Age of Disclosure," President Donald Trump has directed the government to release any and all files pertaining to aliens on Earth. Tonight, we catch up with the film's director, Dan Farah. Full Interview: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6DwyeYT9Jk](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6DwyeYT9Jk)

Seems to be posted a lot and gets debunked every so often and then forgotten about

**One of the most compelling publicly documented UFO reports comes from 1954 at the Woomera Test Range in Australia.** During a weapons trial, an unidentified object was tracked by radar and multiple trained observers using binoculars. Witnesses described a dark grey, perfectly circular object with a translucent appearance hovering directly over the flight path of a Canberra bomber during the test. Radar operators timed the object travelling 15,000 yards in just 10 seconds, giving it an estimated speed of 3,600 mph before it accelerated away and climbed to an altitude greater than 60,000 feet. It was documented in official Royal Australian Air Force intelligence reports and later assessed by Harry Turner, a nuclear defence physicist, who reviewed the reports on unidentified flying objects. His conclusion stated: **“The evidence presented by the reports held by the R.A.A.F. tend to support the above conclusion — namely, that certain strange aircraft have been observed to behave in a manner suggestive of an extraterrestrial origin.”** Cases like this demonstrate why the UFO subject cannot simply be dismissed. These were instrument-tracked events recorded by military personnel, supported by radar data and multiple witnesses. Despite findings like this appearing in official assessments, the subject was never publicly acknowledged by the RAAF at the time. Historical records also show that Australia was closely coordinating UFO intelligence with the U.S. Air Force, which may help explain why incidents like this largely disappeared from public discussion. Source: [https://recordsearch.naa.gov.au/SearchNRetrieve/Interface/ViewImage.aspx?B=1012736](https://recordsearch.naa.gov.au/SearchNRetrieve/Interface/ViewImage.aspx?B=1012736) *Credit:* [*Rhys Dalton-Morgan*](https://x.com/TheUFOzzie)

Hi, it's me the same guy who posted the video of the Jellyfish in Iraq a few months ago back in 2025 which went viral on social media For the past few months I've been obsessed with this UAP as if I knew it before had seen it in my childhood or had some kind of connection to it.. It seemed very familiar and captured my attention more than any other Objects filmed in the region Although I've never been an astronomy enthusiast or a UFO watcher I felt like I was looking at a puzzle piece a missing part of the picture untill I recently remembered almost everything with the help of a friend and I won't go into any details of my story here because it's so strange that I'll probably get ridiculed so I prefer to keep it to myself What's important is that I found this video on Facebook this morning while searching the Arabic internet for the topic It was posted 9 years ago and the first thing that came to mind when I saw it was how similar it was to a jellyfish UAP I don't know if people here are familiar with the video or if they've shared it before here or in any other community but I published it anyway. Time: 9 years ago Location: Maiqouu Center affiliated with Tabarjal Governorate in the Al-Jawf region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Source https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1DSh6ADtnM/

In regards to this post, [https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1rjk5ms/reddit\_user\_umajesticjehovah\_has\_proven\_that\_the/](https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1rjk5ms/reddit_user_umajesticjehovah_has_proven_that_the/) and the claims made in the linked Substack, there are some serious issues with the core premise of this "proof" of the MJ-12 files. The author of that Substack states that the files used, the 345 pages of Operation Paperclip declassified as a FOIA request to the CIA were declassified in 2022, which obviously means, given they have the same identifying stamp as the MJ-12 files which were released in the 80s, that this is proof that the MJ-12 files are real. https://preview.redd.it/fiv58ppg4xmg1.png?width=826&format=png&auto=webp&s=ca05e31c3dc34081417749d8b23b7433fae3f82f They even go so far as to screen shot some pages from those documents and circle the released in 2022 and 834021 on the same page to really let you soak in how nuts discovery is! https://preview.redd.it/3i8f363r4xmg1.png?width=1456&format=png&auto=webp&s=a1fc1e105a9dcc931b5fa19f17bd081eb7232a0a There is only one big glaring issue with this idea and these documents. They were not declassified in 2022, they were declassified in Nov of 1985 as far as I can tell either via the FOIA requests made by Linda Hunt, or subsequent requests by third parties as a result of her research, who first publicized Operation Paperclip in her article "U.S Coverup of Nazi Scientists" in 1985 and then subsequently wrote the book \*"\*Secret Agenda: The United States Government, Nazi Scientists, and Project Paperclip, 1945 to 1990" which was released in 1991 with more documentation in regards to Operation Paperclip. Let me do as the author of that Substack did, and take a screenshot of the very first page of those 345 CIA pages, and circle a couple things in red. https://preview.redd.it/zit3qyij6xmg1.png?width=557&format=png&auto=webp&s=8e86fe6ff2bb5883d21f855a1ad0eb051e7b7a30 These documents were either re-requested and reviewed again in 2022, or first digitized in 2022, but the original documents were absolutely not declassified in 2022, these documents were originally declassified in Nov of 1985, and Linda was researching via FOIA requests these documents prior to her publication in 1985. The numbers 834021 in relation to classified CIA documents were declassified and available in the exact same time frame as the MJ-12 documents originally were published. As the author of that Substack states, perhaps we need disclosure from dedicated civilian research. https://preview.redd.it/wst68b0b7xmg1.png?width=741&format=png&auto=webp&s=d203484b5b39b130bce2b8fa2059c2fd17288067 I do have to question though how truly dedicated said research is when the LITERAL FIRST PAGE of the documents you are using to prove your hypothesis clearly shows that these were FOIA requests done at a contemporaneous time as the MJ-12 documents were released in the mid 80s and later digitized in 2022. EDIT\* Since somebody asked, here is what I can see in regards to the other documents and routing numbers in the substack. ER-1-2735 and **A-1762.1** is mentioned in relation to this 2003 document [https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP80R01731R000800150009-3.pdf](https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP80R01731R000800150009-3.pdf), which does not have an approved for release though stuff has clearly been lost in the photocopying that could have been a stamp, but it does show the document was reviewed on the 18th of March 1981 in the bottom right corner of page 2 and 3 and marked declassified. Its not as definitive as the previous one with an actual released stamp, but I think given the fact that it is literally also about operation paperclip it would be wildly coincidental if it was not also FOIA'd in the 80's given the date of 1981 is on a review notation declassifying it. You can actually see the review date of 1981 in the screen shot the substack author took of the page in the substack lol. Also the ER is cutoff so I don't even think that is super definitive but regardless that document really really looks like it was also FOIAd in the early 80s, and in that case it was well before the release of the MJ-12 documents so in some respects while less definitive its almost more damning. [2003 Document](https://preview.redd.it/irw89trqxymg1.png?width=335&format=png&auto=webp&s=04b9b0d2b4eb22baa1cfe2390d1657677eda4453) The 2001 document CIA SI 28-55 says reviewed 11/21/ and either 84 or 94 but the handwriting is absolutely dogwater, either way we at least know that the document was being reviewed far before the 2001 date on the digital release. I can't really get more in depth on that one, as it does not have as much information. https://preview.redd.it/vubr76ezxymg1.png?width=469&format=png&auto=webp&s=52cd95ad3a83deeb9fa7fd83d197dfe6fde6c3f4

Hey r/UFOs, It's been a wild few weeks. Between the latest Epstein files, political drama, and everything else going on in the world right now, we've seen a large uptick in low effort, derailing, off-topic political commentary across the sub. The mod team wanted to address this directly and ask for your help. Clearly UFOs intersect with politics. The issue is, we're being flooded with low-effort, political hyper-partisan comments, "this is all a distraction" posts/comments, hot takes about politicians, and general political venting that has nothing to do with UFOs. This stuff derails threads, starts flame wars, and buries the actual substantive discussion that makes this community worth visiting. It's also been consuming a massive amount of moderator time and energy. We are tasked to be non-partisan in our moderator duties, and thus will continue to remove low effort comments regardless of which side of the political aisle they originate from. We know everyone is reacting to what's happening in the world right now. We're all human. However, this subreddit's mission is clear: *a community for discussion related to Unidentified Flying Objects. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. We aim to elevate good research while maintaining healthy skepticism.* That's what 5 million of us signed up for, and that's what we need to protect. Our intent here is not to suppress differing opinions or create an echo chamber. Skeptical approaches and critical thinking are welcome and necessary for this topic to thrive. We're specifically targeting the low-effort, irrelevant political noise that adds nothing to the conversation. Remember, r/UFOs is an international community with members from all over the world. Not everyone here is American, and not everyone wants to get pulled into US political arguments. We come here to discuss UFOs. When US-centric political discourse dominates threads, it crowds out participation from users who are here for the topic itself. Please be mindful of that. For a lot of people, r/UFOs is one of the few places online where they can focus on a shared mystery without inheriting the full weight of contemporary political conflict. That should mean something. There are countless places online for political debate. There are very few places online with 5 million people focused on UFOs. We want to be clear about the nuance here because we're not looking to ban any topic outright. What we're asking is that discussion stays on-topic to UFOs, UAP, and the phenomenon. We will not allow low-effort political commentary, partisan soap boxing, QAnon-adjacent conspiracies, or comments that use UFO threads as a platform for unrelated political grievances. We're trying to protect good, deep conversation and avoid the kind of knee-jerk inflammatory stuff that turns whole threads into a mess. **Examples of what is NOT allowed:** * "None of this disclosure stuff matters, it's all a distraction from the Epstein files" * "Of course they're releasing UFO stuff now, they don't want you looking at what Trump/Biden/\[politician\] is doing" * "\[Trump/Clinton/<politician of choice>\] is a pedo and everyone knows it" * "Wake up, the elites are all in on it -- pizzagate is real" * Unsourced TikToks or social media screenshots claiming satanic rituals, cannibalism, or other conspiracy content unrelated to UFOs * Slurs or insults targeting any racial, religious, or political group * General "red vs blue" political arguments that have nothing to do with the phenomenon **Examples of what IS allowed:** * "The Epstein files mention \[specific name/program\] which has a documented connection to UFO research -- here's the filing from the DoJ site" * "Epstein was funding research into consciousness/metamaterials/zero-point energy/remote viewing -- here's the source material" * "This new executive order/bill/amendment directly impacts UAP disclosure because \[specific reason\]" * "Congressional hearing on UAP is scheduled for \[date\], here's what we know about who's testifying and what topics are expected" * Sourced "follow the money" research showing connections between public figures and UFO-related programs, contractors, or funding * Anything that is genuinely on-topic to UFOs, UAP, and the phenomenon as long as it doesn't break existing rules The simple test: if your comment would work just as well in a politics subreddit without changing a word, it probably doesn't belong here. To be clear: disallowing insults and low-effort hot takes does not prevent criticism of power. Saying "this person has an extensive documented history of dishonesty that undermines their credibility on UAP transparency" is fair critique. It's substantive and it's actually useful to readers trying to evaluate information. What we're removing is content that doesn't do any of that. Many of the comments we end up removing aren't advancing the discussion in a meaningful way - they're emotional release. We get it. We regularly hear "my bad, I was having a rough week" in modmail, and we've all been there. But when that kind of venting becomes the default mode of engagement, it drowns out the more thoughtful contributions and drives away people who actually want to discuss UFOs in a political context - ongoing disclosure efforts, congressional statements, legislation, policy. We don't want to lose those conversations to noise. These aren't new rules. **Rule 2 (Stay on-topic)** already covers this: "Posts and comments of off-topic politics may be removed at moderator discretion. There are many political aspects which are relevant to ufology, but we aim to keep the subreddit free of forum-sliding partisan politics." **Rule 3 (Be Substantive)** also applies. And plenty of the political comments we're seeing also violate **Rule 1 (Be Civil)** \-- partisan attacks, insults, and hostility directed at other users or public figures. We're just going to be more strict about enforcement given the current climate. As a reminder, our [existing enforcement policy](https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1fsv01j/important_notice_in_response_to_overwhelming/) on disruptive behavior still applies: any removal for Rule 1, trolling, ridicule, etc. will result in an immediate one-week temporary ban. A second violation will be met with a permanent ban. Egregious violations may result in an immediate permanent ban. This applies equally to off-topic political flame wars and personal attacks. If you've been banned and feel it was unfair, you can always appeal by sending us a modmail. We're more interested in seeing improvement than doling out punishment. We use a short 7-day ban as an initial “hey, that was out of line” warning. Most of the time people reach out, explain what happened or apologize, and if it’s clear they get it, we’ll often lift the ban. Our bans aren’t meant to be punitive, they’re just there to reset the tone and keep things on track. **How you can help:** Report content that violates this using **"Be Civil"** (Rule 1), **"Stay on-topic"** (Rule 2), or **"Be Substantive"** (Rule 3) as your report reason. We can't be everywhere at once on a sub this size, and community reports make a real difference. And please, don't engage with off-topic bait. Responding to a rule violation with another rule violation is never okay. Downvote it, report it and move on. We're asking for your help and your feedback on this. This is everyone's community, not just the moderators'. Keep doing what you do best - the research, the analysis, the sighting reports, the deep dives. That's what makes this place what it is. Help us protect it. **Useful links:** * Our enforcement policy on disruptive behavior: [Important Notice](https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1fsv01j/important_notice_in_response_to_overwhelming/) * Full subreddit rules: [r/UFOs Rules](https://sh.reddit.com/r/UFOs/wiki/rules/) * Questions or discussion about moderation? Post in our sister subreddit [r/ufosmeta](https://old.reddit.com/r/ufosmeta/) * Want to message the mods directly? [Send us a message](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/UFOs) \-- The r/UFOs Mod Team

# Representative Eric Burlison, Director James Fox, and Host Leslie Kean [here](https://i.imgur.com/IIhCEpi.png) - LIVESTREAM AMA - Saturday March 7, 2026 @ 1:00 PM EST/10 AM PST We’re excited to announce a new **multi-subreddit livestream AMA** featuring **Representative Eric Burlison (MO-07)** and **documentary director James Fox**, hosted by investigative journalist **Leslie Kean**. We are honored that Representative Burlison with us to discuss efforts towards disclosure in Washington. 🗓️ **When:** **[Saturday, March 7, 2026 - 1:00 PM Eastern/10 AM PST](https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?iso=20260307T13&p0=179&msg=Multi-Subreddit+&font=cursive)** 📺 **Livestream (YouTube):** https://www.youtube.com/live/9bzH1ssL9yI?si=ztNZFoElsGMtkYqx 🐦 **X (Twitter):** https://x.com/theanomalousc 🎮 **Twitch:** https://www.twitch.tv/theanomalouscoalition --- ## How to Participate To help us organize questions across multiple communities we need to gather the questions in advance: ✅ **Please keep it to *ONE question per comment*.** ✅ Want to ask more than one? Make **separate comments** (one question each). ✅ **Upvote** the questions you most want asked. ✅ Please review existing questions before posting duplicates. ✅ Make sure questions are on-topic. Participating subreddits include: **r/Aliens, r/Experiencers, r/HighStrangeness, r/UFOB, r/UFOs**, and **r/AnomalousCoalition**. **We will be providing a written transcript after the event has concluded as well as a summary for the community within a few days**. Any feedback or suggestions for process improvement please go to r/AnomalousCoalition --- ## Short Bios **Representative Eric Burlison (MO-07)** Sixth-generation Missourian; former investment advisor and software consultant; earned a BA in Philosophy and an MBA from Missouri State University; elected to Congress in 2022 representing Missouri’s 7th District and currently sits on the House Oversight Committee. Bio: https://burlison.house.gov/about **James Fox (Director / Filmmaker)** Documentary filmmaker known for UAP-focused investigative films, including *The Program* and *Moment of Contact: New Revelations of Alien Contact (2025).* *The Program:* https://www.imdb.com/title/tt33549764/ *Moment of Contact (2025):* https://www.imdb.com/title/tt38890268/ **Leslie Kean (Host)** Investigative journalist and author known for high-credibility reporting on UAP and other anomalous topics; bestselling author of *UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Record.* See more at https://www.lesliekean.com --- ## Recommended Reading / Context Leslie Kean (The Debrief): “Landmark Brazilian UFO Case Reaches Capitol Hill as Varginha Incident Turns 30” https://thedebrief.org/landmark-brazilian-ufo-case-reaches-capitol-hill-as-varginha-incident-turns-30/ --- **Drop your questions below - and remember: ONE question per comment.**